Skip to main content

A CLOSER LOOK AT CLOSURE SCEPTICISM

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

ABSTRACT

The paper argues that there is no valid closure principle that can be used to infer sceptical conclusions. My argument exploits the Gettier Intuition that knowledge is incompatible with accidentally true belief. This intuition is interpreted as placing a constraint on beliefs that can count as knowledge: only beliefs which are based on reasons that are relevantly linked to the beliefs' truth can qualify as knowledge. I argue that closure principles are to reflect this constraint by accommodating the requirement that a subject's belief p needs to be based on her competent derivation of p from a known q. The emerging account is finally argued to reconcile Dretske's anti-closure intuitions with the intuition that we can extend knowledge by deduction, while simultaneously blocking closure arguments for scepticism about the external world.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2006.00203.x

Affiliations: University College Oxford OX1 4AW UK, Email: michael.blome@univ.ox.ac.uk

Publication date: May 1, 2006

bpl/paso/2006/00000106/00000003/art00006
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more