XIII —HYPER-RELIABILITY AND APRIORITY

Author: Pryor, James

Source: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 106, Number 3, May 2006 , pp. 327-344(18)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

I argue that beliefs that are true whenever held—like Lexist, I am thinking about myself, and (in an object-dependent framework) Jack = Jack— needn't on that account be a priori. It does however seem possible to remove the existential commitment from the last example, to get a belief that is knowable a priori. I discuss some difficulties concerning how to do that.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2006.00200.x

Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy New York University New York, NY 1003 USA

Publication date: 2006-05-01

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page