VIII —INDISCRIMINABILITY AND THE SAMENESS OF APPEARANCE

Author: Farkas, Katalin

Source: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 106, Number 2, March 2006 , pp. 205-225(21)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

How exactly should the relation between a veridical perception and a corresponding hallucination be understood? I argue that the epistemic notion of `indiscriminability', understood as a lack of evidence for the distinctness of things, is not suitable for defining this relation. Instead, we should say that a hallucination and a veridical perception involve the same phenomenal properties. This has further consequences for attempts to give necessary and sufficient conditions for the identity of phenomenal properties in terms of indiscriminability, and for considerations about the phenomenal sorites.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2006.00194.x

Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy Central European University Náador utca 9, Budapest 1051 Hungary, Email: farkask@ceu.hu

Publication date: 2006-03-01

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page