VIII —INDISCRIMINABILITY AND THE SAMENESS OF APPEARANCE
Author: Farkas, Katalin
Source: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 106, Number 2, March 2006 , pp. 205-225(21)
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Abstract:
How exactly should the relation between a veridical perception and a corresponding hallucination be understood? I argue that the epistemic notion of `indiscriminability', understood as a lack of evidence for the distinctness of things, is not suitable for defining this relation. Instead, we should say that a hallucination and a veridical perception involve the same phenomenal properties. This has further consequences for attempts to give necessary and sufficient conditions for the identity of phenomenal properties in terms of indiscriminability, and for considerations about the phenomenal sorites.Document Type: Research article
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2006.00194.x
Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy Central European University Náador utca 9, Budapest 1051 Hungary, Email: farkask@ceu.hu
Publication date: 2006-03-01
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Philosophy
- By this author: Farkas, Katalin

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert
Get Permissions