Skip to main content

CAN AN APPEAL TO CONSTITUTION SOLVE THE EXCLUSION PROBLEM?

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract: 

Jaegwon Kim has argued that unless mental events are reducible to subvening physical events, they are at best overdeterminers of their effects. Recently, nonreductive physicalists have endorsed this consequence claiming that the relationship between mental events and their physical bases is tight enough to render any such overdetermination nonredundant, and hence benign. I focus on instances of this strategy that appeal to the notion of constitution. Ultimately, I argue that there is no way to understand the relationship between irreducible mental events and their physical bases such as to both eliminate causal redundancy and preserve the efficacy of mental events.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2007.00304.x

Affiliations: Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Rochester

Publication date: December 1, 2007

bpl/papq/2007/00000088/00000004/art00006
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more