THE VAGUENESS ARGUMENT FOR MEREOLOGICAL UNIVERSALISM*
In this paper, I critically discuss one of the more influential arguments for mereological universalism, what I will call ‘the Vagueness Argument’. I argue that a premise of the Vagueness Argument is not well supported and that there are at least two good reasons for thinking that the premise in question is false.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: Department of Philosophy Virginia Commonwealth University
Publication date: September 1, 2006