Skip to main content

NOT SO PROMISING AFTER ALL: EVALUATOR-RELATIVE TELEOLOGY AND COMMON-SENSE MORALITY

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract: 

Douglas Portmore has recently argued in this journal for a “promising result”– that combining teleological ethics with “evaluator relativism” about the good allows an ethical theory to account for deontological intuitions while “accommodat[ing] the compelling idea that it is always permissible to bring about the best available state of affairs.” I show that this result is false. It follows from the indexical semantics of evaluator relativism that Portmore's compelling idea is false. I also try to explain what might have led to this misunderstanding.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2006.00265.x

Affiliations: Department of Philosophy University of Maryland

Publication date: 2006-09-01

  • Access Key
  • Free ContentFree content
  • Partial Free ContentPartial Free content
  • New ContentNew content
  • Open Access ContentOpen access content
  • Partial Open Access ContentPartial Open access content
  • Subscribed ContentSubscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed ContentPartial Subscribed content
  • Free Trial ContentFree trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more