Author: Norcross, Alastair

Source: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 78, Number 4, December 1997 , pp. 380-403(24)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Abstract:

: It is sometimes claimed that a consequentialist theory such as utilitarianism has problems accommodating the importance of personal commitments to other people. However, by emphasizing the distinction between criteria of rightness and decision procedures, a consequentialist can allow for non-consequentialist decision procedures, such as acting directly on the promptings of natural affection. Furthermore, such non-consequentialist motivational structures can co-exist happily with a commitment to consequentialism. It is possible to be a self-reflective consequentialist who has genuine commitments to individuals and to moral principles, without engaging in self-deception.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0114.00045

Publication date: 1997-12-01

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Philosophy
• By this author: Norcross, Alastair

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers