Do Belief Reports Report Beliefs

Author: Bach K.

Source: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 78, Number 3, September 1997 , pp. 215-241(27)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Abstract: The traditional puzzles about belief reports puzzles rest on a certain seemingly innocuous assumption, that `that'-clauses specify belief contents. The main theories of belief reports also rest on this "Specification Assumption", that for a belief report of the form `A believes that p' to be true,' the proposition that p must be among the things A believes. I use Kripke's Paderewski case to call the Specification Assumption into question. Giving up that assumption offers prospects for an intuitively more plausible approach to the semantics of belief reports. But this approach must confront a puzzle of its own: it turns out that every case is a Paderewski case, at least potentially.

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

The full text article is temporarily unavailable.

We apologise for the inconvenience. Please try again later.

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A