Narratives of Norwegian governance: elaborating the strong state tradition
Author: Christensen T.1
Source: Public Administration, Volume 81, Number 1, March 2003 , pp. 163-190(28)
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Abstract:
Any account of Norwegian governance must engage with four different state traditions (Olsen 1988): the sovereign rationalitybounded or centralised state, the institutional state, the corporatistpluralist state and the supermarket state. The first three traditions are historically interconnected, while the supermarket state is a fundamental and recent challenge to them. These traditions have coexisted in different combinations and their significance has changed several times, since the Constitution of 1814. In this article, first, I outline each tradition, tracing its historical roots, dominant actors and the competing definitions and interpretations. Second, I discuss the problems or dilemmas that confronted these traditions and the reforms enacted in response to them. Finally, I assess the consequences of these reforms. I focus on the postWorld War II period. I finish by discussing the dynamic interdependence of the different state traditions.Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9299.00341
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content

Click here for Page Help