Skip to main content

The Concept of Appropriation and The Offence of Theft

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

The English law of theft is confusing and problematic in principle. Since the introduction of the Theft Act 1968 there has been inconsistency in the interpretation of appropriation as court and commentators have grappled with the intuition that appropriation must entail some subjective element and cannot be purely objective. Although subjectivity is traditionally associated with culpability rather than with conduct, it is argued that some acts can be subjective and yet factual and stand as causes to effects. Appropriation is such an act, its necessary and sufficient condition being a mindset, here termed proprietary subjectivity, on the part of the actor. It is argued that clarification of the concept of appropriation can help to resolve misperceived problems. Such clarification will also reveal other problems in the law of theft. Some tentative comments de lege ferenda are made suggesting how these problems can be addressed.

Keywords: Theft; appropriation; criminal law; offences against property; philosophy of action; proprietary subjectivity; though-acts

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2007.00653.x

Affiliations: *Law Department, London School of Economics

Publication date: July 1, 2007

bpl/mlr/2007/00000070/00000004/art00003
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more