On Problems with Descriptivism: Psychological Assumptions and Empirical Evidence

Authors: GARCÍA-RAMÍREZ, EDUARDO; SHATZ, MARILYN

Source: Mind & Language, Volume 26, Number 1, February 2011 , pp. 53-77(25)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

We offer an empirical assessment of description theories of proper names. We examine empirical evidence on lexical and cognitive development, memory, and aphasia, to see whether it supports Descriptivism. We show that description theories demand much more, in terms of psychological assumptions, than what the data suggest; hence, they lack empirical support. We argue that this problem undermines their success as philosophical theories for proper names in natural languages. We conclude by presenting and defending a preliminary alternative account of reference from a developmental perspective.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01410.x

Affiliations: 1: Department of Psychology Department of Linguistics University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Publication date: 2011-02-01

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page