Author: REBOUL, ANNE

Source: Mind & Language, Volume 21, Number 5, November 2006 , pp. 587-596(10)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Abstract:

: 

Glüer and Pagin (2003) have claimed that autistic speakers are a counterexample to HOT theories of meaning and communication. Through analysis of their argument and a re-examination of the literature, I show that autistic speakers are not a counterexample to HOT theories, but, conversely, that such theories are necessary to account for their communicative peculiarities.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00293.x

Publication date: 2006-11-01

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Language & Linguistics ,  Philosophy
• By this author: REBOUL, ANNE

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers