Skip to main content

Learning to Think: A Response to the Language of Thought Argument for Innateness

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract: 

Jerry Fodor's argument for an innate language of thought continues to be a hurdle for researchers arguing that natural languages provide us with richer conceptual systems than our innate cognitive resources. I argue that because the logical/formal terms of natural languages are given a use‐theory of meaning, unlike predicates, logical/formal terms might be learned without a mediating internal representation. In that case, our innate representational system might have less logical structure than a natural language, making it possible that we augment our innate representational system and improve our ability to think by learning a natural language.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0268-1064.2005.00287.x

Publication date: June 1, 2005

bpl/mila/2005/00000020/00000003/art00003
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more