Author: Bontly, Thomas D.

Source: Mind & Language, Volume 20, Number 3, June 2005 , pp. 288-312(25)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Abstract:

:

Advocates of linguistic pragmatics often appeal to a principle which Paul Grice called Modified Occam's Razor: ‘Senses are not to be multiplied beyond necessity’. Superficially, Grice's principle seems a routine application of the principle of parsimony (‘Entities are not to be multiplied beyond necessity’). But parsimony arguments, though common in science, are notoriously problematic, and their use by Griceans faces numerous objections. This paper argues that Modified Occam's Razor makes considerably more sense in light of certain assumptions about the processes involved in language acquisition, and it describes recent empirical findings that bear these assumptions out. The resulting account solves several difficulties that otherwise confront Grice's principle, and it draws attention to problematic assumptions involved in using parsimony to argue for pragmatic accounts of linguistic phenomena.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0268-1064.2005.00286.x

Publication date: 2005-06-01

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Language & Linguistics ,  Philosophy
• By this author: Bontly, Thomas D.

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers