The Grain of Domains: The Evolutionary-Psychological Case Against Domain-General Cognition
Authors: Atkinson A.P.; Wheeler M.
Source: Mind & Language, Volume 19, Number 2, April 2004 , pp. 147-176(30)
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Abstract:
: Prominent evolutionary psychologists have argued that our innate psychological endowment consists of numerous domain-specific cognitive resources, rather than a few domain-general ones. In the light of some conceptual clarification, we examine the central in-principle arguments that evolutionary psychologists mount against domain-general cognition. We conclude (a) that the fundamental logic of Darwinism, as advanced within evolutionary psychology, does not entail that the innate mind consists exclusively, or even massively, of domain-specific features, and (b) that a mixed innate cognitive economy of domain-specific and domain-general resources remains a genuine conceptual possibility. However, an examination of evolutionary psychology's grain problem reveals that there is no way of establishing a principled and robust distinction between domain-specific and domain-general features. Nevertheless, we show that evolutionary psychologists can and do live with this grain problem without their whole enterprise being undermined.Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00252.x
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content

Click here for Page Help