Fodor on Inscrutability

Author: Jerome C. Wakefield¹

Source: Mind & Language, Volume 18, Number 5, November 2003 , pp. 524-537(14)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:

- Free Content

- New Content

- Subscribed Content

- Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Jerry Fodor (1994) proposes a solution to Quine's inscrutability–of–reference problem for certain naturalized semantic theories, thereby defending such theories from charges that they cannot discriminate meanings finely enough. His proposal, combining elements of informational and inferential–role semantics, is to eliminate non–standard interpretations by testing predicate compatibility relations. I argue that Fodor's proposal, understood as primarily aimed at Mentalese, withstands Ray's (1997) and Gates's (1996) objections but nonetheless fails because of unwarranted assumptions about ontological homogeneity of target language predicates, and problems with Fodor's reliance on predicate conjunction to resolve ambiguity. Naturalized semantics thus remains without an answer to the inscrutability objection.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/1468-0017.00241

Affiliations: 1: New York University, USA

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$41.72 plus tax Refund Policy