Theories of Mind and `The Commonsense View'

Author: Macdonald, Cynthia1

Source: Mind & Language, Volume 17, Number 5, November 2002 , pp. 467-488(22)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

It is widely believed that people are sometimes directly aware of their own psychological states and consequently better placed than others to know what the contents of those states are. This (`commonsense') view has been challenged by Alison Gopnik. She claims that experimental evidence from the behaviour of 3- and 4-year-old children both supports the theory theory and shows that the belief in direct and privileged knowledge of one's own intentional states is an illusion. I argue (1) that the experimental evidence is not inconsistent with the commonsense view and that Gopnik's central thesis assumes a particularly crude perceptual account of self-knowledge to which that view is not committed, and (2) that the commonsense view is neutral as between the theory theory and other theories of mind.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/1468-0017.00208

Affiliations: 1: University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand c.macdonald@phil.canterbury.ac.nz

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$41.72 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A