Truthfulness and Relevance in Telling The Time

Authors: van der Henst, Jean-Baptiste1; Carles, Laure2; Sperber, Dan3

Source: Mind & Language, Volume 17, Number 5, November 2002 , pp. 457-466(10)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Someone asked `What time is it?' when her watch reads 3:08 is likely to answer `It is 3:10.' We argue that a fundamental factor that explains such rounding is a psychological disposition to give an answer that, while not necessarily strictly truthful or accurate, is an optimally relevant one (in the sense of relevance theory) i.e. an answer from which hearers can derive the consequences they care about with minimal effort. A rounded answer is easier to process and may carry the same consequences as one that is accurate to the minute. Hence rounding is often a way of optimising relevance. Three simple experiments give support and greater precision to the view that relevance is more important than strict truthfulness in verbal communication.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/1468-0017.00207

Affiliations: 1: University of Leuven, Belgium, 2: Institut Jean Nicod, EHESS, Paris, France dan@sperber.com 3: ECFA, Université de Genéve, Switzerland

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$41.89 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A