Empathy, Neural Imaging and the Theory versus Simulation Debate

Author: Adams, Frederick1

Source: Mind & Language, Volume 16, Number 4, September 2001 , pp. 368-392(25)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

This paper considers the debate over how we attribute beliefs, desires, and other mental states to our fellows. Do we employ a theory of mind? Or do we use simulational brain mechanisms, but employ no theory? One point of dispute between these theories focuses upon our ability to have empathic knowledge of the mind of another. I consider whether an argument posed by Ravenscroft settles the debate in favor of Simulation Theory. I suggest that the consideration of empathy does not settle the dispute. Then I look at recent results from false memory research and other research employing neural imaging. I suggest that new discoveries there may help shape the future of the empirical dimension of the debate.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/1468-0017.00176

Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA.

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$35.56 plus tax

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A