A Connectionist Defence of the Inscrutability Thesis

Author: Calvo Garzón, Francisco

Source: Mind & Language, Volume 15, Number 5, November 2000 , pp. 465-480(16)

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

This paper consists of four parts. In section 1, I shall offer a strategy to bypass a counter-example which Gareth Evans (1975) offers against Quine's Thesis of the Inscrutability of Reference. In section 2, I shall introduce a criterion recently pro-duced by Crispin Wright (1997) in terms of `psychological simplicity' which threatens the perverse route offered in section 1. In section 3, I shall argue that a LOT model of human cognition could motivate Wright's criterion. In section 4, I shall argue that if we instead model human cognition by a recurrent neural network, then Wright's criterion is unmotivated. Thus I shall produce a Connectionist Defence of the Inscrutability Thesis.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00145

Affiliations: 1: Departamento de Filosofía, Universidad de Murcia, E-30100 Murcia, Spain

Publication date: 2000-11-01