The Content of Intentions
Author: Patherie, Elisabeth
Source: Mind & Language, Volume 15, Number 4, September 2000 , pp. 400-432(33)
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Abstract:
By distinguishing between prior intentions and intentions in action, Searle has helped solve a number of difficulties confronted by the earlier versions of the causal theory of actions. Yet this distinction also raises important new issues. In particular, once a distinction is posited between two types of intentions, one must specify what the exact nature of their respective contents is and explain how the two types of intentions are connected. I suggest that in addressing those issues we could benefit from the insights provided by recent work in the coginitive neuroscience of action. I try to show how this work can help us give a more precise characterization of the content of intentions in action and bridge the gap between prior intentions and intentions in action.Document Type: Research article
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00142
Affiliations: 1: CREA, École Polytechnique, Paris, France
Publication date: 2000-09-01
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Language & Linguistics , Philosophy
- By this author: Patherie, Elisabeth

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert
Get Permissions