What Brains Won’t Tell Us About the Mind: A Critique of the Neurobiological Argument Against Representational Nativism

Author: Samuels, Richard

Source: Mind & Language, Volume 13, Number 4, December 1998 , pp. 548-570(23)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:


Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)


In their recent and influential book Rethinking Innateness, Jeffrey Elman and his co-authors argue that evidence from neurobiology provides us with grounds to reject representational nativism (RN). I argue that Elman et al.’s argument fails because it makes a series of unwarranted assumptions about RN and about the extent to which neurobiological data constrain claims about the innateness of mental rep-resentations. Moreover, I briefly discuss how we ought to understand RN and argue that on two prima facie plausible approaches, far from refuting nativism, the evidence from neurobiology may not even be relevant to the question of whether or not RN is true.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00091

Affiliations: Department of Philosophy, 433 Logan Hall, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104–6304, USA.

Publication date: December 1, 1998

Related content



Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page