Intentional Agency and the Metarepresentation Hypothesis

Author: Sterelny, Kim1

Source: Mind & Language, Volume 13, Number 1, March 1998 , pp. 11-28(18)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

This paper sketches a distinction between organisms that represent their world and those that do not. It uses this distinction to focus upon the idea that within the class of representational systems there has been a key cognitive innovation, the development of metarepresentational capacities. The idea is that a set of abilities is present in adult humans, developing humans and the great apes, and these abilities require metarepresentational capacities. So perhaps the capacity to metarepresent distinguishes intentional agents like us from less fancy agents. This paper sceptically discusses two key cases for the metarepresentational hypothesis: imitation and the `theory-theory' of social intelligence.

Document Type: Original article

DOI: 10.1111/1468-0017.00062

Affiliations: 1: Philosophy Department, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$41.72 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A