Can Connectionists Explain Systematicity?

Author: Matthews, Robert J.1

Source: Mind & Language, Volume 12, Number 2, June 1997 , pp. 154-177(24)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Classicists and connectionists alike claim to be able to explain systematicity. The proposed classicist explanation, I argue, is little more than a promissory note, one that classicists have no idea how to redeem. Smolensky's (1995) proposed connectionist explanation fares little better: it is not vulnerable to recent classicist objections, but it nonetheless fails, particularly if one requires, as some classicists do, that explanations of systematicity take the form of a `functional analysis'. Nonetheless, there are, I argue, reasons for cautious optimism about the prospects of a connectionist explanation.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/1468-0017.00041

Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$41.72 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A