Can Connectionists Explain Systematicity?
Author: Matthews, Robert J.
Source: Mind & Language, Volume 12, Number 2, June 1997 , pp. 154-177(24)
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Abstract:
Classicists and connectionists alike claim to be able to explain systematicity. The proposed classicist explanation, I argue, is little more than a promissory note, one that classicists have no idea how to redeem. Smolensky's (1995) proposed connectionist explanation fares little better: it is not vulnerable to recent classicist objections, but it nonetheless fails, particularly if one requires, as some classicists do, that explanations of systematicity take the form of a `functional analysis'. Nonetheless, there are, I argue, reasons for cautious optimism about the prospects of a connectionist explanation.Document Type: Research article
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00041
Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
Publication date: 1997-06-01
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Language & Linguistics , Philosophy
- By this author: Matthews, Robert J.

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert
Get Permissions