Skip to main content

TRUTH TELLING AS REPARATIONS

Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

International instruments now defend a “right to the truth” for victims of political repression and violence and include truth telling about human rights violations as a kind of reparation as well as a form of redress. While truth telling about violations is obviously a condition of redress or repair for violations, it may not be clear how truth telling itself is a kind of reparations. By showing that concerted truth telling can satisfy four features of suitable reparations vehicles, I defend the idea that politically implemented modes of truth telling to, for, and by those who are victims of gross violation and injustice may with good reason be counted as a kind of reparations. Understanding the doubly symbolic character of reparations, however, makes clearer why truth telling is unlikely to be sufficient reparation for serious wrongs and is likely to be sensitive to the larger context of reparative activity and its social, political, and historical background.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: human rights; injustice; redress; reparations; truth commissions; victims; violence

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Arizona State University, School of Historical, Philosophical, and Religious Studies, P.O. Box 874302, Tempe, AZ 85287-4302 USA, Email: [email protected]

Publication date: 2010-07-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more