Skip to main content

MORAL DELIBERATION AND OPERATIVE RIGHTS: A RESPONSE TO MARY MAGADA-WARD AND CYNTHIA GAYMAN

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract:

The aim of this article is to show how intimately connected Beth J. Singer's theory of operative rights is with her understanding of the deliberative process. I thus argue against Cynthia Gayman's effort to set in contrast Singer's theory of rights and Dewey's characteristic emphasis on reflective morality. Since I take the value of Singer's approach to be most evident in its relevance to the abortion debate as an ongoing deliberation, I question whether Mary Magada-Ward sufficiently appreciates the dialogical and deliberative emphases of Singer's stance. My goal, however, is not so much to argue against either Gayman or Magada-Ward as it is to argue for taking Singer's position even more seriously than either author does. In particular, I want to highlight the finely nuanced character of Singer's philosophical intervention in the debate regarding abortion, especially stressing certain features that Gayman and Magada-Ward overlook.

Keywords: Beth Singer; John Dewey; abortion; deliberation; feminism; reflective morality; rights

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2007.00496.x

Affiliations: Department of Philosophy, 240 Sparks Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802-5201, USA, Email: vxc5@psu.edu

Publication date: July 1, 2007

bpl/meta/2007/00000038/00000004/art00009
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more