Skip to main content


Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)



This essay defends consequentialist approaches to moral evaluation from a charge of moral arrogance made by Bernard Gert in “Moral Arrogance and Moral Theories.” A distinction is made between a commitment to there being a right answer to moral questions and certainty about the nature of the right answers.

Keywords: Gert; consequentialism; moral arrogance

Document Type: Research Article


Affiliations: Department of Philosophy, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA, Email:

Publication date: July 1, 2007

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Partial Open Access Content
Partial Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more