Skip to main content

TOPICAL EPISTEMOLOGIES

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract:

What is the point of developing an epistemology for a topic—for example, morality? When is it appropriate to develop the epistemology of a topic? For many topics—for example, the topic of socks—we see no need to develop a special epistemology. Under what conditions, then, does a topic deserve its own epistemology? I seek to answer these questions in this article. I provide a criterion for deciding when we are warranted in developing an epistemological theory for a topic. I briefly apply this criterion to moral epistemology and argue that some approaches to moral epistemology should be abandoned. I also argue that we can develop an epistemology for a topic without committing ourselves to a specific substantive theory of justification, such as reliabilism or coherentism, if we work within a suitably neutral framework.

Keywords: epistemology; epistemology of mathematics; moral epistemology; topical epistemology

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00472.x

Affiliations: Department of Philosophy, Campus Box 4540, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790-4540, USA, Email: tstewar@ilstu.edu

Publication date: 2007-01-01

  • Access Key
  • Free ContentFree content
  • Partial Free ContentPartial Free content
  • New ContentNew content
  • Open Access ContentOpen access content
  • Partial Open Access ContentPartial Open access content
  • Subscribed ContentSubscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed ContentPartial Subscribed content
  • Free Trial ContentFree trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more