TOUCH, SOUND, AND THINGS WITHOUT THE MIND

Author: CLEVE, JAMES

Source: Metaphilosophy, Volume 37, Number 2, April 2006 , pp. 162-182(21)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

:

Two notable thought experiments are discussed in this article: Reid's thought experiment about whether a being supplied with tactile sensations alone could acquire the conception of extension and Strawson's thought experiment about whether a being supplied with auditory sensations alone could acquire the conception of mind-independent objects. The experiments are considered alongside Campbell's argument that only on the so-called relational view of experience is it possible for experiences to make available to their subjects the concept of mind-independent objects. I consider how the three issues ought to be construed as raising questions about woulds, coulds, or shoulds—and argue that only on the normative construal of them are they resolvable as intended by the a priori methods of the philosophers who pose them.

Keywords: Campbell; experience; extension; mind-independence; Reid; sound; Strawson; touch

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00429.x

Affiliations: 1: School of Philosophy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA , Email: vancleve@usc.edu

Publication date: 2006-04-01

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page