Quest Religion, Anti-Fundamentalism, and Limited Versus Universal Compassion

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Download / Buy Article:

Abstract:

Goldfried and Miner (2002) claimed to provide evidence that those high in quest religion are less likely to help a religiously closed-minded person even when the help does not promote closed-mindedness. As a result, they concluded that quest religion is associated with limited, not universal, compassion. An experiment modeled on theirs but avoiding several methodological problems suggested a very different conclusion. Although participants high in quest religion helped a religiously closed-minded person less when doing so promoted closed-mindedness, they were no less likely to help such a person when it did not promote closed-mindedness. These results suggest that quest religion is associated with antipathy toward promoting closed-mindedness, not with antipathy toward religiously closed-minded persons. The scope of compassion associated with quest religion does not appear to be limited in the way Goldfried and Miner claimed.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00397.x

Affiliations: 1: C. Daniel Batson is a Professor in the Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045., Email: dbatson@ku.edu 2: Drew M. Denton and Jason T. Vollmecke were undergraduates majoring in psychology at the University of Kansas. ; nelluvme@yahoo.com, Email: djscrew-81@hotmail.com

Publication date: March 1, 2008

Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more