Skip to main content

Quest Religion, Anti-Fundamentalism, and Limited Versus Universal Compassion

Buy Article:

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Goldfried and Miner (2002) claimed to provide evidence that those high in quest religion are less likely to help a religiously closed-minded person even when the help does not promote closed-mindedness. As a result, they concluded that quest religion is associated with limited, not universal, compassion. An experiment modeled on theirs but avoiding several methodological problems suggested a very different conclusion. Although participants high in quest religion helped a religiously closed-minded person less when doing so promoted closed-mindedness, they were no less likely to help such a person when it did not promote closed-mindedness. These results suggest that quest religion is associated with antipathy toward promoting closed-mindedness, not with antipathy toward religiously closed-minded persons. The scope of compassion associated with quest religion does not appear to be limited in the way Goldfried and Miner claimed.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00397.x

Affiliations: 1: C. Daniel Batson is a Professor in the Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045., Email: dbatson@ku.edu 2: Drew M. Denton and Jason T. Vollmecke were undergraduates majoring in psychology at the University of Kansas. ; nelluvme@yahoo.com, Email: djscrew-81@hotmail.com

Publication date: March 1, 2008

bpl/jssr/2008/00000047/00000001/art00013
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more