Religious Regulation and the Courts: The Judiciary's Changing Role in Protecting Minority Religions from Majoritarian Rule

Authors: Wybraniec, John1; Finke, Roger2

Source: Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Volume 40, Number 3, September 2001 , pp. 427-444(18)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Following the 1990 Smith v. Employment Division of Oregon ruling on the limits of religious freedom, many protested that the Supreme Court had opened the door for majoritarian oppression of minority rights. Using data collected on 2,109 court cases on religion from 1981-1996 we document recent trends in court decisions on religion and address questions posed by supply-side theory, legal scholars, and the sociology of law. We find that religious sects and cults were more likely to be involved in court cases and more likely to receive unfavorable rulings. Multivariate models confirm these finding and support the charges of legal scholars that the Smith decision has decreased the rate of rulings favoring religious groups. Finally, we find that the Smith decision had both a period effect and a case precedent effect.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0021-8294.00067

Affiliations: 1: 6480 East Pioneer, Roscommon, Michigan 48653., Email: wybraniec@i2k.net 2: Department of Sociology, Pennsylvania State University, 211 Oswald Tower, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802., Email: rfinke@psu.edu

Publication date: 2001-09-01

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page