Skip to main content

MUST ETHICS BE THEOLOGICAL? A CRITIQUE OF THE NEW PRAGMATISTS

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

ABSTRACT

In the last decade there has been a pragmatic turn in the work of those doing Christian ethics, especially as represented by the work of Jeffrey Stout and Franklin Gamwell. The pragmatic turn represents a critique of the highly influential work of Stanley Hauerwas and Alasdair MacIntyre, which argues for a strongly intra-church ethics. The pragmatists are correct in arguing that Christian ethics must engage the public sphere. However, I argue that they are deeply mistaken in their claim that this engagement must rest on a weak or non-existent theology. I show that the claim that robust theology adds nothing to ethics, and that we can get along without it, is unsustainable.

Keywords: abortion; communitarians; end-of-life care; forced birth control; human good; knowledge; liberal regimes; life extension; metaphysics; narrative theology; natural law; pragmatism; truth

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9795.2009.00405.x

Affiliations: Department of Languages, Philosophy, and Speech CommunicationUtah State UniversityLogan, UT 84322435.797.1244, Email: richard.sherlock@usu.edu

Publication date: 2009-12-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more