Metaphysics, History, And Rational Justification: A MacIntyrean Response to Franklin Gamwell's Critique

Author: Reames, Kent

Source: Journal of Religious Ethics, Volume 27, Number 2, Summer 1999 , pp. 257-281(25)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

This article addresses Franklin Gamwell's critique of Alasdair MacIntyre's account of the nature of rational justification. I argue that MacIntyreans have good reasons to take seriously Gamwell's critique, and thus to reformulate MacIntyre's position to make clear that that position does not rest on a denial of all a priori claims. The author outlines such a reformulation, drawing heavily on MacIntyre's account (in his 1990 Aquinas Lecture) of the place of a priori claims within the development of rational traditions of inquiry. When thus rethought, MacIntyre's position grounds a twofold response to Gamwell's critique.

Keywords: ethics; historicism; metaphysics; rationality; tradition; transcendental

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0384-9694.00017

Publication date: June 1, 1999

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page