Why Press Coverage of a Client Influences the Audit Opinion

Author: Joe J.R.¹

Source: Journal of Accounting Research, Volume 41, Number 1, March 2003 , pp. 109-133(25)

Purchase options

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$39.62 plus tax Refund Policy

More like this?

In this: publication
By this: publisher
In this Subject: Business
By this author: Joe J.R.

Content Key:

- Free

- New

- Open Access

- Subscribed

- Free Trial

Abstract:

In this study I use an experiment to examine why auditors are more likely to issue going–concern opinions when the client has been the subject of negative press coverage prior to the date of the audit opinion. I find no evidence that negative press coverage increases auditors’ perceptions of legal liability, as was suggested in the prior literature. I do find, however, that negative press coverage increases auditors’ perception of a client's bankruptcy probability and this, in turn, leads auditors to modify the audit opinion. Because the press coverage presented in this study provides no new information, the results suggest that auditors react too strongly to redundant information. This over–reaction can result in inefficient allocation of audit resources and can have deleterious affects on clients. Accordingly, policy makers, auditors and their clients might be interested in how auditors’ reliance on redundant information can be reduced.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.00098

Affiliations: 1: Georgia State University