Skip to main content

Abortion, Competing Entitlements, and Parental Responsibility

Buy Article:

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

abstract

Don Marquis offered the most famous philosophical argument against abortion. His argument contained a novel defence of the idea that foetuses have the same moral status as ordinary adults. The first half of this paper contends that even if Marquis has shown that foetuses have this status, he has not proven that abortion is therefore wrong. Instead his argument falls victim to problems similar to those raised by Judith Thomson, problems that have plagued most anti-abortion arguments since.

Once Marquis's anti-abortion argument is shown to fail, this raises the question of whether there is some way to circumvent the problems. The second half of the paper argues that this issue hinges on important questions about responsibility for risky behaviour and the duties of parenthood. Because we have yet to develop appropriate theoretical frameworks for judging such questions, we cannot yet know whether Marquis's anti-abortion argument — and indeed most other anti-abortion arguments — can be completed.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2009.00462.x

Affiliations: Alex Rajczi, Department of Philosophy, Claremont McKenna College, 850 Columbia Avenue, Claremont, CA 91711, USA., Email: alex.rajczi@claremontmckenna.edu

Publication date: November 1, 2009

bpl/japp/2009/00000026/00000004/art00004
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more