Skip to main content

Torture — The Case for Dirty Harry and against Alan Dershowitz

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

abstract 

Can torture be morally justified? I shall criticise arguments that have been adduced against torture and demonstrate that torture can be justified more easily than most philosophers dealing with the question are prepared to admit. It can be justified not only in ticking nuclear bomb cases but also in less spectacular ticking bomb cases and even in the so-called Dirty Harry cases. There is no morally relevant difference between self-defensive killing of a culpable aggressor and torturing someone who is culpable of a deadly threat that can be averted only by torturing him. Nevertheless, I shall argue that torture should not be institutionalised, for example by torture warrants.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00356.x

Affiliations: Department of Politics & International Relations, University of Oxford, Manor Road, Oxford, OX1 3UQ, UK

Publication date: 2006-08-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more