Skip to main content

Behavioural Genetics: Why Eugenic Selection is Preferable to Enhancement

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)



Criminal behaviour is but one behavioural tendency for which a genetic influence has been suggested. Whilst this research certainly raises difficult ethical questions and is subject to scientific criticism, one recent research project suggests that for some families, criminal tendency might be predicted by genetics. In this paper, supposing this research is valid, we consider whether intervening in the criminal tendency of future children is ethically justifiable. We argue that, if avoidance of harm is a paramount consideration, such an intervention is acceptable when genetic selection is employed instead of genetic enhancement. Moreover, other moral problems in avoiding having children with a tendency to criminal behaviour, such as the prospect of social discrimination, can also be overcome.

Document Type: Research Article


Affiliations: 1: Uehiro Chair in Applied Ethics, University of Oxford; 2: Research Assistant, Ethics Unit, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; 3: Post-Doctoral Associate, Medical Ethics Unit, Imperial College London; 4: Research Assistant, Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, University of Melbourne.

Publication date: 2006-05-01

  • Access Key
  • Free ContentFree content
  • Partial Free ContentPartial Free content
  • New ContentNew content
  • Open Access ContentOpen access content
  • Partial Open Access ContentPartial Open access content
  • Subscribed ContentSubscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed ContentPartial Subscribed content
  • Free Trial ContentFree trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more