Skip to main content

Against the Golden Rule Argument Against Abortion

Buy Article:

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

R. M. Hare and Harry J. Gensler have each argued that abortion can be shown to be immoral by appealing to a version of the golden rule. I argue that both versions of the golden rule argument against abortion should be rejected: each rests on a version of the golden rule which is objectionable on independent grounds, each is unable to support its conclusion when the rule is satisfactorily modified, and each is unable to avoid the implication that contraception is as wrong as abortion and for the same reason. In addition, some further problems particular to each position are identified.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-5930.00055

Affiliations: Department of Philosophy, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA

Publication date: August 1, 1997

bpl/japp/1997/00000014/00000002/art00010
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more