From Group Member to Democratic Citizen: How Deliberating with Fellow Jurors Reshapes Civic Attitudes

Authors: Gastil, John; Black, Laura W.¹; Deess, E. Pierre²; Leighter, Jay³

Source: Human Communication Research, Volume 34, Number 1, January 2008 , pp. 137-169(33)

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

This investigation assesses the attitudinal impact of one of America's most distinctive and famous group activities—jury deliberation. Tocqueville and the U.S. Supreme Court have both reasoned that jury service can promote civic engagement and recent research supports this view. The present study examines whether the attitudinal impact of jury deliberation depends on the quality of one's jury experience. Two panel surveys of 2,410 total jurors tested the reciprocal relationship between the subjective experience of deliberation and the changes in civic attitudes toward oneself, fellow citizens, and public institutions. Principal results of structural equation models showed multiple effects of jury deliberation on attitudes, but there were no effects on one's civic identity and political self-efficacy. Reciprocally, every civic attitude except faith in fellow citizens was predictive of deliberative experience in at least one of the two studies. Overall, the study bolsters the claim of deliberative democratic theorists that the experience of consequential face-to-face talk can make private individuals into public citizens by reinforcing their confidence in fellow citizens and public institutions.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00316.x

Affiliations: 1: School of Communication Studies, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701 2: Institutional Research and Planning, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102 3: Department of Communication Studies, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68178

Publication date: 2008-01-01