Four Simple Tests of Campaign Contributions and Trade Policy Preferences

Authors: Beaulieu E.1; Magee C.2

Source: Economics and Politics, Volume 16, Number 2, July 2004 , pp. 163-187(25)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

This paper uses campaign contribution data to examine trade policy preferences among political action committees. With perfect factor mobility, as the Heckscher–Ohlin (HO) model assumes, interest group trade positions should depend on their factor of production but not on their industry. We show, consistent with the 2 × 2 HO model, that capital groups consistently back representatives supporting trade liberalization while labor groups favor protectionists. Unlike previous work, we also measure the variation in trade policy preferences within capital and labor groups. We find evidence that the industry net export position significantly affects labor unions' trade policy preferences. Industry characteristics have no impact on capital group lobbying. The former result suggests that empirical analyses of labor PAC contributions that exclude industry characteristics may be misspecified.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2004.00136.x

Affiliations: 1: Department of Economics, University of Calgary 2: Department of Economics, Bucknell University

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$43.08 plus tax

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A