Skip to main content

Real Work for Aggregates

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract

In this paper reasons are given for accepting a paradigmatically ‘metaphysical’ thesis called Unrestricted Mereological Composition, or something close to it. These reasons are drawn from thoroughly empirical considerations that played a significant role in the history of physical sciences, particularly in the emergence of the Newtonian laws of motion. Roughly: this metaphysical thesis is supported by a principle of ‘inference to the best explanation’ of observations of the very same kind that paradigmatically furnish evidence supporting or undermining empirical theories in physics. There are methodological morals in metaphilosophy to be drawn from this historical example – blurring the distinction that has been traditionally drawn between ‘metaphysical’ theses and ‘empirical’ hypotheses.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2006.01084.x

Affiliations: School of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Victoria, Australia, 3800; ; RPargetter@haileybury.vic.edu.au, Email: john.bigelow@arts.monash.edu.au

Publication date: December 1, 2006

bpl/dltc/2006/00000060/00000004/art00011
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more