Risk and the Neoliberal State: Why Post-Mitch Lessons Didn't Reduce El Salvador's Earthquake Losses

In this: publication
By this: publisher
In this Subject: <a title="Social & Public Welfare" href="/content/subcat?j_subject=243&j_availability=">Social & Public Welfare
By this author: Wisner, Ben

Author: Wisner, Ben

Source: Disasters, Volume 25, Number 3, September 2001 , pp. 251-268(18)

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Although El Salvador suffered light losses from Hurricane Mitch in 1998, it benefited from the increased international aid and encouragement for advance planning, especially mitigation and prevention interventions. Thus, one would have supposed, El Salvador would have been in a very advantageous position, able more easily than its economically crippled neighbours, Honduras and Nicaragua, to implement the `lessons of Mitch'. A review of the recovery plan tabled by the El Salvador government following the earthquakes of early 2001 shows that despite the rhetoric in favour of `learning the lessons of Mitch', very little mitigation and prevention had actually been put in place between the hurricane (1998) and the earthquakes (2001). The recovery plan is analysed in terms of the degree to which it deals with root causes of disaster vulnerability, namely, the economic and political marginality of much of the population and environmental degradation. An explanation for the failure to implement mitigation and preventive actions is traced to the adherence by the government of El Salvador to an extreme form of neoliberal, free market ideology, and the deep fissures and mistrust in a country that follow a long and bloody civil war.

Keywords: El Salvador; earthquake; landslide; flash floods; vulnerability; mitigation; prevention; recovery; re-housing; housing; livelihoods; land tenure; environmental management; neoliberalism; local government; civil society; disaster and democracy