Skip to main content

THE DANGERS OF EUTHANASIA AND DEMENTIA: HOW KANTIAN THINKING MIGHT BE USED TO SUPPORT NON‐VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA IN CASES OF EXTREME DEMENTIA

Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

ABSTRACT

Some writers have argued that a Kantian approach to ethics can be used to justify suicide in cases of extreme dementia, where a patient lacks the rationality required of Kantian moral agents. I worry that this line of thinking may lead to the more extreme claim that euthanasia is a proper Kantian response to severe dementia (and similar afflictions). Such morally treacherous thinking seems to be directly implied by the arguments that lead Dennis Cooley and similar writers to claim that Kant might support suicide. If rationality is the only factor in valuing a human life, then the loss of that rationality (however such loss might be defined) would allow us to use essentially utilitarian thinking in order to support non‐voluntary euthanasia, since the patients themselves would no longer be moral agents that demand respect.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Muskingum University in Ohio (USA)

Publication date: 2012-06-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more