Skip to main content

EQUALITY AND THE DUTY TO RETARD HUMAN AGEING

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

ABSTRACT

Where does the aspiration to retard human ageing fit in the ‘big picture’ of medical necessities and the requirements of just healthcare? Is there a duty to retard human ageing? And if so, how much should we invest in the basic science that studies the biology of ageing and could lead to interventions that modify the biological processes of human ageing? I consider two prominent accounts of equality and just healthcare – Norman Daniels's application of the principle of fair equality of opportunity and Ronald Dworkin's account of equality of resources – and conclude that, once suitably amended and revised, both actually support the conclusion that anti-ageing research is important and could lead to interventions that ought to be considered ‘medical necessities’.

Keywords: ageing; disease; equality; justice

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00712.x

Affiliations: Queen's University in Canada

Publication date: October 1, 2010

bpl/biot/2010/00000024/00000008/art00002
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more