Skip to main content

RETRACING LIBERALISM AND REMAKING NATURE: DESIGNER CHILDREN, RESEARCH EMBRYOS, AND FEATHERLESS CHICKENS

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

ABSTRACT

Liberal theory seeks to achieve toleration, civil peace, and mutual respect in pluralistic societies by making public policy without reference to arguments arising from within formative ideals about what gives value to human life. Does it make sense to set aside such conceptions of the good when it comes to controversies about stem cell research and the genetic engineering of people or animals? Whether it is reasonable to bracket our worldviews in such cases depends on how we answer the moral questions that the use of these biotechnologies presuppose. I argue that the moral language of liberal justice – of rights and duties, interests and opportunities, freedom and consent, equality and fairness – cannot speak to these underlying concerns about what the human embryo is, why the natural lottery matters to us, and whether ‘animal nature’ is worth preserving. I conclude that liberal theory is incapable of furnishing a coherent or desirable account to govern the way we use our emerging powers of biotechnology.

Keywords: animal ethics; genetic engineering; liberalism; state neutrality; stem cell research; the Enlightenment

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00707.x

Publication date: May 1, 2010

bpl/biot/2010/00000024/00000004/art00004
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more