NON-THERAPEUTIC MODIFICATION AND SELF-INTEREST: REPLY TO SCHRAMME
Author: CURTIS, BENJAMIN L.
Source: Bioethics, Volume 22, Number 8, October 2008 , pp. 455-456(2)
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Abstract:
In this article I reply to Thomas Schramme's argument that there are no good reasons for the prohibition of severe forms of voluntary non-therapeutic body modification. I argue that on paternalistic assumptions there is, in fact, a perfectly good reason.Keywords: body modification; paternalism; self interest; well-being
Document Type: Letter to the Editor
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00668.x
Publication date: 2008-10-01
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Biology , Philosophy
- By this author: CURTIS, BENJAMIN L.

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert
Get Permissions