Skip to main content

DEAF BY DESIGN: DISABILITY AND IMPARTIALITY

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

ABSTRACT

In ‘Benefit, Disability and the Non-Identity Problem’, Hallvard Lillehammer uses the case of a couple who chose to have deaf children to argue against the view that impartial perspectives can provide an exhaustive account of the rightness and wrongness of particular reproductive choices. His conclusion is that the traditional approach to the non-identity problem leads to erroneous conclusions about the morality of creating disabled children. This paper will show that Lillehammer underestimates the power of impartial perspectives and exaggerates the ethical force of partial perspectives, which in turn commits him to providing weak justifications for the choice made by the couple in his example case.

Keywords: deafness; designer babies; disability; impartiality; non-identity problem; procreative liberty

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00658.x

Publication date: October 1, 2008

bpl/biot/2008/00000022/00000008/art00002
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more