Skip to main content

THE MORAL IMPORTANCE OF SELECTING PEOPLE RANDOMLY

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

ABSTRACT

This article discusses some ethical principles for distributing pandemic influenza vaccine and other indivisible goods. I argue that a number of principles for distributing pandemic influenza vaccine recently adopted by several national governments are morally unacceptable because they put too much emphasis on utilitarian considerations, such as the ability of the individual to contribute to society. Instead, it would be better to distribute vaccine by setting up a lottery. The argument for this view is based on a purely consequentialist account of morality; i.e. an action is right if and only if its outcome is optimal. However, unlike utilitarians I do not believe that alternatives should be ranked strictly according to the amount of happiness or preference satisfaction they bring about. Even a mere chance to get some vaccine matters morally, even if it is never realized.

Keywords: consequentialism; lottery; pandemic influenza; utilitarianism; vaccine

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00636.x

Publication date: July 1, 2008

bpl/biot/2008/00000022/00000006/art00005
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more