INSTILLING HOPE AND RESPECTING PATIENT AUTONOMY: RECONCILING APPARENTLY CONFLICTING DUTIES

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Download / Buy Article:

Abstract:

ABSTRACT

In contemporary American medical practice, certain physicians are critical and wary of the current emphasis on patient autonomy in medicine, questioning whether it really serves the complex needs of severely ill patients. Physicians such as Eric Cassell and Thomas Duffy argue that the duty of beneficence should override the duty to respect autonomy when conflicts arise in clinical situations. After evaluating their claim that severe illness robs patients of their autonomy, I will argue that this perceived conflict between beneficence and autonomy is ill-conceived, resting on misperceptions about both the capacity for autonomy and the meaning of hope. Considering insights on hope from phenomenologist Gabriel Marcel and theologian William Lynch, as well as drawing upon a case study involving a bone marrow patient, I claim that respecting and nurturing patients’ capacity for autonomy is a necessary condition for acting beneficently and fostering authentic hope.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00438.x

Affiliations: Dept of Theology Xavier University 3800 Victory Parkway Cincinnati OH 45207, Email: bestej@xavier.edu

Publication date: June 1, 2005

Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more