If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Continuous Covariates in Mark-Recapture-Recovery Analysis: A Comparison of Methods

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Download / Buy Article:

Abstract:

Summary. 

Time varying, individual covariates are problematic in experiments with marked animals because the covariate can typically only be observed when each animal is captured. We examine three methods to incorporate time varying, individual covariates of the survival probabilities into the analysis of data from mark-recapture-recovery experiments: deterministic imputation, a Bayesian imputation approach based on modeling the joint distribution of the covariate and the capture history, and a conditional approach considering only the events for which the associated covariate data are completely observed (the trinomial model). After describing the three methods, we compare results from their application to the analysis of the effect of body mass on the survival of Soay sheep (Ovis aries) on the Isle of Hirta, Scotland. Simulations based on these results are then used to make further comparisons. We conclude that both the trinomial model and Bayesian imputation method perform best in different situations. If the capture and recovery probabilities are all high, then the trinomial model produces precise, unbiased estimators that do not depend on any assumptions regarding the distribution of the covariate. In contrast, the Bayesian imputation method performs substantially better when capture and recovery probabilities are low, provided that the specified model of the covariate is a good approximation to the true data-generating mechanism.

Keywords: Bayesian inference; Imputation; Individual covariates; Mark-recapture-recovery; Missing covariates; Time-varying continuous covariates; Trinomial model

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01390.x

Affiliations: 1: School of Mathematics, Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NF, England 2: School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9LZ, Scotland

Publication date: December 1, 2010

Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more